[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080225155301.GA6787@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:53:01 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: revert load_balance_monitor()
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 04:28:02PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 20:05 +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> Subject: sched: fully revert load_balance_monitor()
>
> The following commit causes a number of serious regressions:
>
> commit 6b2d7700266b9402e12824e11e0099ae6a4a6a79
> Author: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Fri Jan 25 21:08:00 2008 +0100
> sched: group scheduler, fix fairness of cpu bandwidth allocation for task groups
>
> Namely:
> - very frequent wakeups on SMP, reported by PowerTop users.
> - cacheline trashing on (large) SMP
> - some latencies larger than 500ms
>
> While there is a mergeable patch to fix the latter, the former issues
> are IMHO not fixable in a manner suitable for .25 (we're at -rc3 now).
> Hence I propose to revert this patch and try again for .26.
I was just about to complain about the frequent wakeups caused by the
original patch.
It's responsible of 70% of wakeups on an otherwise idle system on s390.
Thanks :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists