[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080225120050.AE81.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:10:43 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
"Max Krasnyanskiy" <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Spang <daniel.spang@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@...ck.org>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Tiny cpusets -- cpusets for small systems?
Hi Pual
> Looking at some IA64 sn2 config builds I have laying about, I see the
> following text sizes for a couple of versions, showing the growth of
> the cpuset/cgroup apparatus over time:
>
> 25933 2.6.18-rc3-mm1/kernel/cpuset.o (Aug 2006)
> vs.
> 37823 2.6.25-rc2-mm1/kernel/cgroup.o (Feb 2008)
> 19558 2.6.25-rc2-mm1/kernel/cpuset.o
>
> So the total has grown from 25933 to 57381 text bytes (note that
> this is IA64 arch; most arch's will have proportionately smaller
> text sizes.)
hm, interesting.
but unfortunately the cpuset have more than depend.(i.e. CONFIG_SMP)
To more bad thing, some embedded cpu have poor or no atomic instruction
support.
at that, turn on CONFIG_SMP become large performace regression ;)
I am not already embedded engineer.
thus, I might have made a mistake.
(BTW: I am large server engineer now)
but no thinking dependency is wrong, may be.
Pavel, what do you think it?
- kosaki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists