[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080227133850.4249.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:45:18 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] page reclaim throttle take2
Hi
> One more thing, I would request you to add default heuristics (number of
> reclaimers), based on the number of cpus in the system. Letting people tuning it
> is fine, but defaults should be related to number of cpus, nodes and zones on
> the system. Zones can be reaped in parallel per node and cpus allow threads to
> run in parallel. So please use that to come up with good defaults, instead of a
> number like "3".
I don't think so.
all modern many cpu machine stand on NUMA.
it mean following,
- if cpu increases, then zone increases, too.
if default value increase by #cpus, lock contension dramatically increase
on large numa.
Have I overlooked anything?
and, (but) i afraid to 3 is too small value.
if you have another test result on large machine, please show me.
- kosaki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists