[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080227140042.66abb805.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:00:42 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] page reclaim throttle take2
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:45:18 +0900
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> > One more thing, I would request you to add default heuristics (number of
> > reclaimers), based on the number of cpus in the system. Letting people tuning it
> > is fine, but defaults should be related to number of cpus, nodes and zones on
> > the system. Zones can be reaped in parallel per node and cpus allow threads to
> > run in parallel. So please use that to come up with good defaults, instead of a
> > number like "3".
>
> I don't think so.
> all modern many cpu machine stand on NUMA.
> it mean following,
> - if cpu increases, then zone increases, too.
>
> if default value increase by #cpus, lock contension dramatically increase
> on large numa.
>
> Have I overlooked anything?
>
>
How about adding something like..
==
CONFIG_SIMULTANEOUS_PAGE_RECLAIMERS
int
default 3
depends on DEBUG
help
This value determines the number of threads which can do page reclaim
in a zone simultaneously. If this is too big, performance under heavy memory
pressure will decrease.
If unsure, use default.
==
Then, you can get performance reports from people interested in this
feature in test cycle.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists