[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47C6A516.4070707@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:12:06 -0500
From: Mark Hounschell <dmarkh@....rr.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"markh@...pro.net >> Mark Hounschell" <markh@...pro.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> My vision on the direction we should take wrt cpu isolation.
>
> Next on the list would be figuring out a nice solution to the workqueue
> flush issue.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Is it now the intent, not only that I have to enable cpusets in the
kernel but I will also have to use them in userland to take advantage of
this.
And hot-plug too??
Can I predict that in the future that userland sched_setaffinity will be
taken away also and be forced to use cpusets?
And hot-plug too??
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists