linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:12:06 -0500
From:	Mark Hounschell <dmarkh@....rr.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
	Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"markh@...pro.net >> Mark Hounschell" <markh@...pro.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> My vision on the direction we should take wrt cpu isolation.
> 
> Next on the list would be figuring out a nice solution to the workqueue
> flush issue.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

Is it now the intent, not only that I have to enable cpusets in the
kernel but I will also have to use them in userland to take advantage of
this.

And hot-plug too??

Can I predict that in the future that userland sched_setaffinity will be
taken away also and be forced to use cpusets?

And hot-plug too??

Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/