linux-kernel - Re: [patch 12/21] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1204296534.5311.8.camel@localhost>
Date:	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:48:54 -0500
From:	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
To:	minchan Kim <barrioskmc@...il.com>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 12/21] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure

On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 13:58 +0900, minchan Kim wrote:
>         
>         +#ifdef CONFIG_NORECLAIM
>         +static inline void lru_cache_add_noreclaim(struct page *page)
>         +{
>         +       __lru_cache_add(page, LRU_NORECLAIM);
>         +}
>         +#else
>         +static inline void lru_cache_add_noreclaim(struct page *page)
>         +{
>         +       BUG("Noreclaim not configured, but page added
>         anyway?!");
>         +}
>         +#endif
>         +
> 
> BUG() can't take a argument. 

Right.  I don't have a clue how that got there :-(.

Thanks,
Lee

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/