[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1204296564.5311.10.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:49:24 -0500
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
rientjes@...gle.com, nacc@...ibm.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, clameter@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Filter based on a nodemask as well as a gfp_mask
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 23:01 -0600, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Mel wrote:
> > A positive benefit of
> > this is that allocations using MPOL_BIND now use the local-node-ordered
> > zonelist instead of a custom node-id-ordered zonelist.
>
> Could you update the now obsolete documentation (perhaps just delete
> the no longer correct remark):
>
> Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt:
>
> MPOL_BIND: This mode specifies that memory must come from the
> set of nodes specified by the policy.
>
> The memory policy APIs do not specify an order in which the nodes
> will be searched. However, unlike "local allocation", the Bind
> policy does not consider the distance between the nodes. Rather,
> allocations will fallback to the nodes specified by the policy in
> order of numeric node id. Like everything in Linux, this is subject
> to change.
>
Yes, will do.
Thanks, Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists