linux-kernel - Re: Performance versus FreeBSD 7.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080229155408.116fa5a1.diegocg@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:54:08 +0100
From:	Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>
To:	"Stephen Cuppett" <cuppett@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Performance versus FreeBSD 7.0

El Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:38:00 -0500, "Stephen Cuppett" <cuppett@...il.com> escribió:

> loads and 1500% at high loads. When compared with the best performing
> Linux kernel (2.6.22 or 2.6.24) performance is 15% better. Results are

There has been some performance problems with sysbench performance in linux
which made it slower than freebsd, there were some patches to speed things up,
not sure if they have been merged.

Myself I find fun that they look at Linux as the Leader That Must Be Surpassed.
All the performance highlights of freebsd 7.0 are things that linux already did some
years ago.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/