[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1204319614.2316.39.camel@dv>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:13:34 -0500
From: Pavel Roskin <proski@....org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Zan Lynx <zlynx@....org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...masters.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.25] module: allow ndiswrapper to use GPL-only
symbols
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 12:28 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> >
> > This still leaves us with the workqueue interface:
> >
> > __create_workqueue_key
> > destroy_workqueue
> > flush_workqueue
> > queue_work
>
> Hmm. Personally, I don't see those as being a big issue, but they've been
> marked GPL-only for a long while.
>
> The thing is, I personally don't mind, and I think "derived code" is what
> matters, but others disagree, and quite frankly, I'm not going to force
> them - I have my _personal_ beliefs, but hey, others have theirs.
>
> So you really need to talk to not me, but to the people who actually wrote
> and maintain that code.
As far as I can tell, those people have never tried to prevent
ndiswrapper from using their code. Both times ndiswrapper was prevented
from using GPLONLY symbols, it was done unintentionally.
> When they come back and say "yeah, we think
> ndiswrapper is a special case and we're ok with it", I'll happily either
> mark those things non-GPL or just mark ndiswrapper special in the module
> loader again.
OK, I'll keep it in mind in case such approach actually becomes
necessary.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists