[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080229211513.GI27212@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:15:13 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Pavel Roskin <proski@....org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Zan Lynx <zlynx@....org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...masters.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.25] module: allow ndiswrapper to use GPL-only
symbols
* Pavel Roskin <proski@....org> wrote:
> I already know what USB folks will say. They want proprietary drivers
> to be in the userspace. I doubt ndiswrapper will ever be ported to
> the userspace. It's much more likely that some other approach will be
> used.
btw., what are the technical reasons why ndiswrapper cannot be done in
userspace, much like the (wildly successful) FUSE concept?
what's the main hardware access method of ndiswrapper - only PIO, or
mmio as well? In the former case, ioperm() should work, in the latter
case, mmap()ing the device aperture should work.
Frankly, it would be a great approach for the following reason: it would
be _far_ easier for people to write a proper free driver, if the NDIS
driver was in user-space, in a nicely debuggable, traceable, observable
environment. I dont really see what the technical difficulties there are
here.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists