| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <m3fxvb9wuh.fsf@maximus.localdomain> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:17:10 +0100 From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl> To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Few ideas... Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de> writes: > d: I think it would not bad if it were included in the resulting > object file like MODULE_AUTHOR is. I specifically don't want it in the binary - maintainers change, it's not a point of contact for end users. It would be for source code ops only. > If anything, MODULE_AUTHOR could be removed, because the original > author(s) are usually listed at the top of the .c file and not > always the ones to talk to when there is a bug (=> the maintainer > is). Perhaps it's there because of copyright. -- Krzysztof Halasa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists