[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080304002651.95089ff1.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 00:26:51 -0600
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, maxk@...lcomm.com, mingo@...e.hu,
tglx@...utronix.de, oleg@...sign.ru, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rientjes@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] cpuset: cpuset irq affinities
Paul M wrote:
> Except that this isn't currently possible if you're also trying to do
> memory hardwalling on those cpusets, since then sibling cpusets can't
> share memory nodes.
Yes, there would be interactions, on both the CPU and Memory side with
some second order mechanisms (hardwalls and sched domains.)
Still, I ask, where's the beef -- the real users?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists