[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1204620907.1278.7.camel@localhost>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:55:07 +0100
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] drivers/s390: replace remaining __FUNCTION__
occurrences
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 19:09 -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> __FUNCTION__ is gcc-specific, use __func__
>
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/block/dasd.c | 4 +-
> drivers/s390/char/tape_34xx.c | 2 +-
> drivers/s390/char/vmwatchdog.c | 4 +-
> drivers/s390/char/zcore.c | 2 +-
> drivers/s390/cio/device_status.c | 2 +-
> drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_api.h | 8 +-
> drivers/s390/net/claw.c | 344 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> drivers/s390/net/ctcmain.c | 112 ++++++------
> drivers/s390/net/netiucv.c | 96 ++++++------
> drivers/s390/s390mach.c | 8 +-
> drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h | 2 +-
> 11 files changed, 292 insertions(+), 292 deletions(-)
Urgh, is this really necessary? The linux kernel is always compiled with
gcc for s390. Yes __func__ is a bit shorter and maybe even looks nicer
than __FUNCTION__ but is it really worth the trouble ?
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists