[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1204654039.5698.13.camel@brick>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:07:19 -0800
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>, lenb@...nel.org,
astarikovskiy@...e.de, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 17:46 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> i dont know why they there are so many variants, but all of them seem to
> be used throughout the kernel:
>
> inline : 25648
I'll assume this is the preferred way of saying it.
> __inline__ : 1380
Lots of them in include/asm-*...not sure if there is a reason for this.
> __inline : 368
Almost all of them in drivers/scsi
Cheers,
Harvey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists