linux-kernel - Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:09:36 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>, lenb@...nel.org,
	astarikovskiy@...e.de, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining

Harvey Harrison wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 17:46 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> 
>> i dont know why they there are so many variants, but all of them seem to 
>> be used throughout the kernel:
>>
>>    inline    : 25648
> 
> I'll assume this is the preferred way of saying it.
> 
>>  __inline__  : 1380
> 
> Lots of them in include/asm-*...not sure if there is a reason for this.
> 

Preferred form for code that's exported to userspace (since gcc 
complains with -ansi -pedantic otherwise.)

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/