linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH BUGFIX -rc3] Smack: Don't register smackfs if we're not loaded

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:12:58 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
cc:	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX -rc3] Smack: Don't register smackfs if we're not
 loaded

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> 
> One solution would be to tighten the smackfs code so that it
> handles the uninitialized LSM case properly.

I really would tend to prefer that.

We had a very similar situation in the ACPI/WMI code, where some WMI 
helper routines would crash just because the WMI data structures hadn't 
been initialized.

The proper fix in that case (in my opinion, and the one that thus got 
committed ;^) was simply to make sure that the data structures were simply 
always consistent (and empty), even if the code itself was disabled. That 
just automatically meant that it didn't need any global flags to be 
tested.

So _if_ the alternative is as simple as just making sure that smackfs 
keeps its data structures consistent even when disabled, I think that's 
the right patch, rather than adding a separate hack to not touch them.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/