[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1204700995.17484.7.camel@brick>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 23:09:55 -0800
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>, Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>,
yi.zhu@...el.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
ipw3945-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org, Josh Triplett <josh@...edesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-4965.c: Correct
use of ! and &
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 08:02 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org> wrote:
>
> > I think Al Viro has sent a patch to linux-sparse with subject "[PATCH
> > 3/3] catch !x & y brainos" does exactly that.
>
> ah - nice :-)
>
> /me checks the linux-sparse archive
>
> Al's patch is:
>
> + if (op == '&' && expr->left->type == EXPR_PREOP &&
> + expr->left->op == '!')
> + warning(expr->pos, "dubious: !x & y");
>
> i think there might be similar patterns: "x & !y", "!x | y", "x | !y" ?
>
Well, (!x & y) and (!x | y) are probably the two that might have been
intended otherwise. (x & !y), (x | !y) are probably ok.
Harvey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists