[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080305081904.GA17789@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:19:05 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Cc: Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>, Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>,
yi.zhu@...el.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
ipw3945-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org, Josh Triplett <josh@...edesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-4965.c: Correct
use of ! and &
* Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com> wrote:
> > Al's patch is:
> >
> > + if (op == '&' && expr->left->type == EXPR_PREOP &&
> > + expr->left->op == '!')
> > + warning(expr->pos, "dubious: !x & y");
> >
> > i think there might be similar patterns: "x & !y", "!x | y", "x | !y" ?
> >
>
> Well, (!x & y) and (!x | y) are probably the two that might have been
> intended otherwise. (x & !y), (x | !y) are probably ok.
i think the proper intention in the latter cases is (x & ~y) and
(x | ~y).
My strong bet is that in 99% of the cases they are real bugs and && or
|| was intended.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists