[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47CFFC64.7040703@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:15:00 +0000
From: Andrew Haley <aph@...hat.com>
To: Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@....org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Chris Lattner <clattner@...le.com>,
Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>,
Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@...il.com>,
Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@...opsys.com>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@....cz>,
Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@...el32.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gcc@....gnu.org
Subject: Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction
flag
Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 03:03:15PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Olivier Galibert wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 05:12:07PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>> It's a kernel bug, and it needs to be fixed.
>>> I'm not convinced. It's been that way for 15 years, it's that way in
>>> the BSD kernels, at that point it's a feature. The bug is in the
>>> documentation, nowhere else. And in gcc for blindly trusting the
>>> documentation.
>> No, the bug *in the kernel* was already present (if you had a signal
>> raised during a call to memmove). It's just more visible with GCC 4.3.
>
> I'm curious, since when paper documentation became the Truth and
> reality became a bug?
Isn't that the definition of a bug? That a program does not meet
its specification?
Andrew.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists