[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47D0091E.304@adacore.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:09:18 -0500
From: Robert Dewar <dewar@...core.com>
To: Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Chris Lattner <clattner@...le.com>,
Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>,
Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@...il.com>,
Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@...opsys.com>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@....cz>,
Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@...el32.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gcc@....gnu.org
Subject: Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction
flag
Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 05:12:07PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> It's a kernel bug, and it needs to be fixed.
>
> I'm not convinced. It's been that way for 15 years, it's that way in
> the BSD kernels, at that point it's a feature. The bug is in the
> documentation, nowhere else. And in gcc for blindly trusting the
> documentation.
I agree, it reminds me of Burroughs on the 5500 believing the
Fortran standard which carefully allowed for a stack based
implementation of Fortran, Algol-style, unfortunately no real
Fortran programs worked with this semantics, and it was one of
the factors contributing the demise of the 5500.
>
> OG.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists