[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0803061022150.4061-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:26:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Make PM core handle device registrations
concurrent with suspend/hibernation
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Revised patch below.
> >
> > It looks good. Let's hope it doesn't mess up ACPI too badly... :-)
> >
> > Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
>
> Thanks!
I thought of one more thing you might want to add: device_pm_add()
doesn't handle the case where dev->parent is NULL. You could put in
that static "all_devices_sleeping" flag, which gets set at the end of
dpm_suspend() and cleared at the start of dpm_resume().
> Okay, I also have the appended patch on top of this one. :-)
>
> Rafael
>
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
>
> Include dpm_sysfs_add() into device_pm_add(), in analogy with
> device_pm_remove(), and modify device_add() to call the latter after
> bus_add_device(), to avoid situations in which the PM core may
> attempt to suspend a device the registration of which has not been
> successful.
Clean and simple. Ack.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists