[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200803061726.03277.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 17:26:02 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Make PM core handle device registrations concurrent with suspend/hibernation
On Thursday, 6 of March 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > > Revised patch below.
> > >
> > > It looks good. Let's hope it doesn't mess up ACPI too badly... :-)
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> I thought of one more thing you might want to add: device_pm_add()
> doesn't handle the case where dev->parent is NULL.
I'm not sure what you mean.
If dev->parent is NULL, we get into the "successful" branch where the device is
added to dpm_active. Do you think we should add any extra handling of this
case?
> You could put in that static "all_devices_sleeping" flag, which gets set at
> the end of dpm_suspend() and cleared at the start of dpm_resume().
Well, I don't think it's necessary. dpm_active is empty in that case and
we can use the list_empty(&dpm_active) check instead.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists