linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] add time_after_now and other macros which compare with jiffies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080307012244.ed7625ec.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 7 Mar 2008 01:22:44 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Dave Young" <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] add time_after_now and other macros which compare
 with jiffies

On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:12:29 +0800 "Dave Young" <hidave.darkstar@...il.com> wrote:

> Indeed, I will add proper comment before them.

Sob.  Of the 809 usages of time_after(), it appears that over 700 are
comparing with jiffies.  So with your (good) change, someone will get
buried in well-meaning convert-to-time_after_now patches.

I wonder who that might be?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/