[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1204997163.13653.50.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 17:26:03 +0000
From: Liam Girdwood <lg@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [UPDATED v3][PATCH 5/7] regulator: sysfs ABI
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 21:52 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 05:17:43PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Friday 07 March 2008, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 08:12:12AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 06:12:05PM +0000, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> > >
> > > > > + Some regulator directories will contain a link called parent.
> > > > > + This points to the parent or supply regulator if one exists.
> > >
> > > > I don't think this is needed, why not just parent the device properly in
> > > > the device tree itself?
> > >
> > > The device tree would tend to show parent for the the control interfaces
> > > for the regulators (typically I2C or SPI) but there is likely to be
> > > little or no relationship between that and the power distribution in the
> > > system.
> >
> > I find "parent" a bit awkward, and Greg won't be the only one to
> > be asking that question. Maybe it'd be better named "supply"?
>
> Yes, "parent" means something in the driver model (the parent of the
> device in the tree). I agree with the different wording like "supply"
> if that makes sense. Or something else other than "parent".
>
"supply" sounds good to me.
Liam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists