[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080308055221.GA13434@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:52:21 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [UPDATED v3][PATCH 5/7] regulator: sysfs ABI
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 05:17:43PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Friday 07 March 2008, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 08:12:12AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 06:12:05PM +0000, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> >
> > > > + Some regulator directories will contain a link called parent.
> > > > + This points to the parent or supply regulator if one exists.
> >
> > > I don't think this is needed, why not just parent the device properly in
> > > the device tree itself?
> >
> > The device tree would tend to show parent for the the control interfaces
> > for the regulators (typically I2C or SPI) but there is likely to be
> > little or no relationship between that and the power distribution in the
> > system.
>
> I find "parent" a bit awkward, and Greg won't be the only one to
> be asking that question. Maybe it'd be better named "supply"?
Yes, "parent" means something in the driver model (the parent of the
device in the tree). I agree with the different wording like "supply"
if that makes sense. Or something else other than "parent".
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists