[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200803101442.58811.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:42:58 +1100
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] typesafe: TIMER_INITIALIZER and setup_timer
On Monday 10 March 2008 13:03:14 Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:07:19PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Worst, I can't see a way to apply your technique in general, for
> > non-void-returning functions (eg. interrupt handlers).
>
> Interrupt handlers are easy. Just switch irqreturn_t from into to
> struct {int x;}, adjust the rest of irqreturn.h accordingly, add
> extern void want_irqreturn_t(irqreturn_t);
> then replace 0 ? (f)(x) : (void)0 with want_irqreturn_t((f)(x)) in the
> expression under sizeof and we are all set (assuming Jeff's elimination
> of irq number in place by then or done in parallel).
Hmm, I was hoping we'd kill irqreturn_t some day: I don't think 2.4
compatibility is worth much any more.
That means doing similar things for stop_machine and kthread_create (just from
looking at this patch series).
The benefits of natural-typed callback args drops if the return type pays the
price.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists