linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] typesafe: TIMER_INITIALIZER and setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080310020314.GG27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:03:14 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] typesafe: TIMER_INITIALIZER and setup_timer

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:07:19PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:

>    Worst, I can't see a way to apply your technique in general, for 
> non-void-returning functions (eg. interrupt handlers).

Interrupt handlers are easy.  Just switch irqreturn_t from into to
struct {int x;}, adjust the rest of irqreturn.h accordingly, add
extern void want_irqreturn_t(irqreturn_t);
then replace 0 ? (f)(x) : (void)0 with want_irqreturn_t((f)(x)) in the
expression under sizeof and we are all set (assuming Jeff's elimination
of irq number in place by then or done in parallel).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/