[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080311063514.GA29824@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:35:14 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: maxk@...lcomm.com
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, pj@....com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, menage@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpuset: cpuset irq affinities
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:57:25PM -0700, maxk@...lcomm.com wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> How about something like this; along with the in-kernel version
> of /cgroup/boot this could also provide the desired semantics.
>
> Another benefit of this approach would be that it no longer requires
> PF_THREAD_BIND, as we'd only stick unbounded kthreads into that cgroup.
Looks like my comments to the last posting of this are still not
addressed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists