linux-kernel - Re: [patch] fix ACPI boot regression (was: Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc5)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:04:31 -0400
From:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [patch] fix ACPI boot regression (was: Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc5)

On Monday 10 March 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > so zero-extending the result in the PCI-BIOS read routine fixes the 
> > > regression on my laptop. ( It might fix some other long-standing 
> > > issues we had with PCI-BIOS during the past decade ... ) Both 8-bit 
> > > and 16-bit accesses were buggy.
> > 
> > Oh, wow. That must have been there forever, but very few people 
> > probably ever cared.
> > 
> > And why is your laptop using the BIOS routines anyway? Or was that 
> > just a result of your randconfig having turned off the sane config 
> > access routines?
> 
> yeah, randconfig generated this:
> 
>   CONFIG_PCI=y
>   CONFIG_PCI_GOBIOS=y
>   # CONFIG_PCI_GOMMCONFIG is not set
>   # CONFIG_PCI_GODIRECT is not set
>   # CONFIG_PCI_GOANY is not set
>   CONFIG_PCI_BIOS=y
> 
> which forced the PCI code into the BIOS access method on this otherwise 
> modern system. I disable some of the really-known-to-be-broken .config 
> options in randconfig - but i still bravely keept CONFIG_GO_PCIBIOS in 
> the randomized space, which triggered this.
> 
> On another box, which has a different BIOS, this bug never happened, in 
> tens of thousands of bootup tests.

I think this re-enforces three Axioms

1. Ingo rules!
2. Even the most obvious fix carries some risk
3. The more config options we maintain, the more fragmented is our test coverage.

thanks Ingo,
-Len

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/