[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080311064010.GA4266@gollum.tnic>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:40:10 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ide-tape: remove tape->cache_stage
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:24:51AM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Sunday 09 March 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Prior to allocating a new pipeline stage, the code checked for the existence of
> > a cached pipeline stage to use. Do away with and stick to normal pipeline
> > stages only.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...il.com>
>
> I modified it slightly while merging since AFAICS we still need to check
> 'tape->nr_stages >= tape_max_stages' for idetape_add_chrdev_write_request().
Yep, thanks for spotting that landmine. By the way this driver is full of it :).
> From: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ide-tape: remove tape->cache_stage
>
> Prior to allocating a new pipeline stage, the code checked for the existence of
> a cached pipeline stage to use. Do away with and stick to normal pipeline
> stages only.
>
> [bart: keep idetape_kmalloc_stage() for now]
>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/ide/ide-tape.c | 13 +------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
> @@ -365,8 +365,6 @@ typedef struct ide_tape_obj {
> idetape_stage_t *next_stage;
> /* New requests will be added to the pipeline here */
> idetape_stage_t *last_stage;
> - /* Optional free stage which we can use */
> - idetape_stage_t *cache_stage;
> int pages_per_stage;
> /* Wasted space in each stage */
> int excess_bh_size;
> @@ -1686,16 +1684,10 @@ abort:
>
> static idetape_stage_t *idetape_kmalloc_stage(idetape_tape_t *tape)
> {
> - idetape_stage_t *cache_stage = tape->cache_stage;
> -
> debug_log(DBG_PROCS, "Enter %s\n", __func__);
>
> if (tape->nr_stages >= tape->max_stages)
> return NULL;
> - if (cache_stage != NULL) {
> - tape->cache_stage = NULL;
> - return cache_stage;
> - }
> return __idetape_kmalloc_stage(tape, 0, 0);
> }
>
> @@ -3245,10 +3237,7 @@ static int idetape_chrdev_release(struct
> else
> idetape_wait_for_pipeline(drive);
> }
> - if (tape->cache_stage != NULL) {
> - __idetape_kfree_stage(tape->cache_stage);
> - tape->cache_stage = NULL;
> - }
> +
> if (minor < 128 && test_bit(IDETAPE_FLAG_MEDIUM_PRESENT, &tape->flags))
> (void) idetape_rewind_tape(drive);
> if (tape->chrdev_dir == IDETAPE_DIR_NONE) {
--
Regards/Gruß,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists