[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6fcc0a0803110309m1108382dm7b4aa714576ba813@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:09:22 +0300
From: "Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Suresh Siddha" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, hpa@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, andi@...stfloor.org, hch@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] x86, fpu: split FPU state from task struct - v5
On 3/11/08, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > > - extern void __bad_fxsave_alignment(void);
> > > -
> > > - if (offsetof(struct task_struct, thread.i387.fxsave) & 15)
> > > - __bad_fxsave_alignment();
> >
> > I think removal of such checks needs giving necessary alignment to
> > cache. Previously it worked because of __aligned((16)) and
> > L1_CACHE_SHIFT combo.
>
> it's still checked, just elsewhere:
>
> > + WARN_ON((unsigned long)dst->thread.xstate & 15);
>
> i'd not expect us to ever align worse than 16 bytes in the future
But sysfs tells me alignment of "xstate" is 8 now. Object size is 512 which
is masking it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists