[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080311101126.GY25110@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:11:26 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, hpa@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, andi@...stfloor.org, hch@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] x86, fpu: split FPU state from task struct - v5
* Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> On 3/11/08, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >
> > * Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > - extern void __bad_fxsave_alignment(void);
> > > > -
> > > > - if (offsetof(struct task_struct, thread.i387.fxsave) & 15)
> > > > - __bad_fxsave_alignment();
> > >
> > > I think removal of such checks needs giving necessary alignment to
> > > cache. Previously it worked because of __aligned((16)) and
> > > L1_CACHE_SHIFT combo.
> >
> > it's still checked, just elsewhere:
> >
> > > + WARN_ON((unsigned long)dst->thread.xstate & 15);
> >
> > i'd not expect us to ever align worse than 16 bytes in the future
>
> But sysfs tells me alignment of "xstate" is 8 now. Object size is 512
> which is masking it.
ok - you are right, that needs to be solved then. (object size could
change anytime someone adds a few fields for debugging or whatever)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists