| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20080311133920.68dc410b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:39:20 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: serge@...lyn.com Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:23:00 -0500 serge@...lyn.com wrote: > Quoting Andrew Morton (akpm@...ux-foundation.org): > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc5/2.6.25-rc5-mm1/ > > > > - Added the kgdb tree as git-kgdb-light (Jason Wessel, Ingo Molnar) > > > > - Added a random-security-stuff-apart-from-selinux tree as > > git-security-testing (James Morris) > > > > - suspend-to-disk is still busted on my x86_64 t61p (git-x86, iirc) > > Compiles and boots perfectly on s390 here. whee. Things are going much much more smoothly now than they were in 2.6.24-rcX and 2.6.23-rcX. Tree integration problems are negligible and build errors are far fewer and runtime problems seem to be less too. Fingers crossed. I guess this is due to a combinaton of a) linux-next b) intensive whining and c) extra care which maintainers are taking (due to a) and b)) I suspect that fewer people are testing linux-next and -mm nowadays. We should encourage them to do so, although given the general trainwreckishness of current mainline, this isn't really where our effort should be expended. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists