linux-kernel - Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:10:48 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc:	"David Newall" <davidn@...idnewall.com>,
	"Mike Galbraith" <efault@....de>,
	"Al Viro" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:10:55 +0200
"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:22 AM, David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com> wrote:
> >  Hostility such as that gives this list a bad reputation and drives
> >  people away.  One can (and should) tell people that an idea is
> >  completely wrong without being rude.
> 
> Hey, why don't we create a linux-sensitive@...r.kernel.org and you
> guys can move your nice and friendly chats over there...?

I think it would be far better to create linux-flame and send the hostile
stuff away. In a lot of cultures hostile responses or unfriendly
responses are taken badly. Politeness is a good thing this list needs
more of.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/