linux-kernel - Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020803130548o76f80fedm378f82e95c189ce2@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:48:31 +0200
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	"David Newall" <davidn@...idnewall.com>,
	"Mike Galbraith" <efault@....de>,
	"Al Viro" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance

Hi Alan,

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>  I think it would be far better to create linux-flame and send the hostile
>  stuff away. In a lot of cultures hostile responses or unfriendly
>  responses are taken badly. Politeness is a good thing this list needs
>  more of.

Do you honestly think we should be polite to people trolling on the
LKML? The problem with kill-filing people like J.C. Pizzarro (a known
troll on the GCC mailing list at least) is that other people will
engange in discussing these "proposals" and contribute in generating
noise anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/