linux-kernel - Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <998d0e4a0803130655m747c4a66gd32eb2668f043b4e@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:55:39 +0100
From:	"J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza@...il.com>
To:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance

2008/3/13, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
>
>  On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>  >  I think it would be far better to create linux-flame and send the hostile
>  >  stuff away. In a lot of cultures hostile responses or unfriendly
>  >  responses are taken badly. Politeness is a good thing this list needs
>  >  more of.
>
>
> Do you honestly think we should be polite to people trolling on the
>  LKML? The problem with kill-filing people like J.C. Pizzarro (a known
>  troll on the GCC mailing list at least) is that other people will
>  engange in discussing these "proposals" and contribute in generating
>  noise anyway.

I'm not a troll on the GCC mailing list. Some GCC's people is calling me troll.

   J.C.Pizarro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/