| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0803140405510.3148@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:07:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To: mws@...sted-brains.org
cc: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: whose job is it to include various header files?
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, mws@...sted-brains.org wrote:
> what i said in my first sentence is the imho proper way: if you
> alter sources and includes get obsolete, remove them and fix
> compiling again for files that formerly depended (implicit or
> explicit) on this altered sources. not to much work for the
> developer himself and also not exhausting the compile times.
and, in my defense, that's what i *thought* i was doing, not having
noticed that one of those "unnecessary" #includes really was
required after all. argh. that was embarrassing.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists