[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080314183438.GB6722@ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:34:39 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@...el.hist.no>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Jan Knutar <jk-lkml@....fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hans-Peter Jansen <hpj@...la.net>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, "Fred ." <eldmannen@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Keys get stuck
On Thu 2008-03-13 15:18:10, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> >On Thu 13.Mar'08 at 12:28:13 +0100, Mike Galbraith
> >wrote:
> >
> >>[...]
> >>Swap can definitely keep X off the cpu for extended
> >>periods,
> >>[...]
> >>
> >
> >So I would like to ask if swap letting X (and
> >everything else
> >in my experience) out of the cpu for extended periods is
> >considered normal behaviour, in the sense that nobody is
> >trying to "fix" it (due to it being considered
> >impossible
> >to fix)...?
> >
> Yes, this is perfectly normal. A heavily swapping machine
> will swap out parts of X.
>
> Now, if X has a need for low-latency for keyboard
> handling,
If X needs low-latency for keyboard, X is misdesigned.
Kernel already provides timestamped input events...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists