[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47DAC66D.2000902@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:39:41 +0100
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark early_printk as asmlinkage
Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2008-03-12 15:04:43, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> It's not explicitly marked as asmlinkage, but invoked
>> >from x86_32
>>> startup code with parameters on stack.
>>>
>>> No other architectures define early_printk and none of
>>> them are affected
>>> by this change, since defines asmlinkage as empty token.
>> NAK.
>>
>> The regparm ABI for x86-32 uses parameters on the stack
>> when the function is varadic (as it is here), so this is
>> unnecessary.
>
> I'd call asmlinkage kind of documentation, then. Not everyone is as
> good with x86 abi as you are...
>
Since it's already only used on x86-32 and we no longer support
non-regparm x86, I'd like to at least get to the point where x86-32
doesn't have any function. We can retain it for documentation's sake,
but even then it's iffy... is "this is callable from assembly" really
something arch-invariant.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists