[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803150556090.1791@scrub.home>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:06:47 +0100 (CET)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] cleanups ntp.c (from Ingo)
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, john stultz wrote:
> -#define MAX_TICKADJ 500 /* microsecs */
> +static const long max_tickadj = 500; /* (usec) */
That's a matter of taste, but MAX_TICKADJ just works as well, so why
change it?
> /* TIME_ERROR prevents overwriting the CMOS clock */
> -static int time_state = TIME_OK; /* clock synchronization status */
> -int time_status = STA_UNSYNC; /* clock status bits */
> -static long time_tai; /* TAI offset (s) */
> -static s64 time_offset; /* time adjustment (ns) */
> -static long time_constant = 2; /* pll time constant */
> -long time_maxerror = NTP_PHASE_LIMIT; /* maximum error (us) */
> -long time_esterror = NTP_PHASE_LIMIT; /* estimated error (us) */
> -static s64 time_freq; /* frequency offset (scaled ns/s)*/
> -static long time_reftime; /* time at last adjustment (s) */
> -long time_adjust;
> -static long ntp_tick_adj;
> +static int time_state = TIME_OK; /* clock synch status */
> +int time_status = STA_UNSYNC; /* clock status bits */
> +static long time_tai; /* TAI offset (s) */
> +static s64 time_offset; /* time adjustment (ns) */
> +static long time_constant = 2; /* pll time constant */
> +long time_maxerror = NTP_PHASE_LIMIT;/* maximum error (us) */
> +long time_esterror = NTP_PHASE_LIMIT;/* estimated error (us) */
> +static s64 time_freq; /* frequency offset (scaled ns/s)*/
> +static long time_reftime; /* time at last adjustment (s) */
> +long time_adjust;
> +static long ntp_tick_adj;
I must say I really hate this kind of formating, it either gets out of
sync or requires reformatting. I would very strongly prefer not to
introduce this sort of formatting here.
> +static inline u64 scale_tickadj(u64 adj)
> +{
> + return ((adj * NSEC_PER_USEC) << NTP_SCALE_SHIFT) / NTP_INTERVAL_FREQ;
> +}
The function argument is actually s32 and depending on NTP_INTERVAL_FREQ
it might produce a link error on 32bit archs.
bye, Roman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists