linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] cleanups ntp.c (from Ingo)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:  <47DB97BA.3080109@web.de>
Date:	Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:32:42 +0100
From:	Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@....de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject:  Re: [PATCH 3/5] cleanups ntp.c (from Ingo)

john stultz wrote:
> Make this file more readable by applying a consistent coding style.
> 
> No code changed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> 
> Merged on top of Roman's very similar cleanups.
> (In other words: Blame John for the merge screwups).
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
> 
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/ntp.c
> ===================================================================
<snip>
> @@ -193,21 +197,20 @@ void second_overflow(void)
>  	 * Compute the phase adjustment for the next second. The offset is
>  	 * reduced by a fixed factor times the time constant.
>  	 */
> -	tick_length = tick_length_base;
> -	time_adj = shift_right(time_offset, SHIFT_PLL + time_constant);
> -	time_offset -= time_adj;
> -	tick_length += time_adj;
> +	tick_length	= tick_length_base;
> +	time_adj	= shift_right(time_offset, SHIFT_PLL + time_constant);
> +	time_offset	-= time_adj;
> +	tick_length	+= time_adj;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(time_adjust)) {
> -		if (time_adjust > MAX_TICKADJ) {
> -			time_adjust -= MAX_TICKADJ;
> -			tick_length += MAX_TICKADJ_SCALED;
> -		} else if (time_adjust < -MAX_TICKADJ) {
> -			time_adjust += MAX_TICKADJ;
> -			tick_length -= MAX_TICKADJ_SCALED;
> +		if (time_adjust > max_tickadj) {
> +			time_adjust -= max_tickadj;
> +			tick_length += scale_tickadj(max_tickadj);
> +		} else if (time_adjust < -max_tickadj) {
> +			time_adjust += max_tickadj;
> +			tick_length -= scale_tickadj(max_tickadj);
>  		} else {
> -			tick_length += (s64)(time_adjust * NSEC_PER_USEC /
> -					NTP_INTERVAL_FREQ) << NTP_SCALE_SHIFT;
> +			tick_length += scale_tickadj(time_adjust);
>  			time_adjust = 0;
>  		}
>  	}
<snip>

Since you are at it, isn't "time_adj" a poor name since you also have a 
"time_adjust"?
-- 
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/