[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803151817480.1791@scrub.home>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:23:16 +0100 (CET)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@....de>
cc: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] cleanups ntp.c (from Ingo)
Hi,
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Since you are at it, isn't "time_adj" a poor name since you also have a
> "time_adjust"?
These are two different (and independent) mechanism to adjust time. The
names are a little confusing, but I'd be a little reluctant to rename
time_adj, as the same name is used in the reference implementation.
bye, Roman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists