linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] fbdev: Make deferred I/O work as advertized

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45a44e480803191530p27ec9575l260d6de063a8d6bf@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:30:37 +0800
From:	"Jaya Kumar" <jayakumar.lkml@...il.com>
To:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, adaplas@....net,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fbdev: Make deferred I/O work as advertized

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>  Do we need some of all of that patch in 2.6.25?  I wasn't aware of such a
>  need.
>
>  If the drivers/video/fb_defio.c hunk of that patch fixes something then I'd
>  be inclined to merge the whole thing - adding a new driver won't hurt
>  anyone.
>

Yes, the defio hunk is a bugfix. I agree with pushing the whole thing
to 2.6.25 if there are people who need it in 2.6.25. I believe there
is no risk of impact on anyone else.

Thanks,
jaya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/