[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080320123014.GA15987@Krystal>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:30:14 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jon Masters <jcm@...masters.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] Markers Support for Proprierary Modules
* Rusty Russell (rusty@...tcorp.com.au) wrote:
> On Thursday 20 March 2008 11:27:41 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > There seems to be good arguments for markers to support proprierary
> > modules. So I am throwing this one-liner in and let's see how people react.
> > It only makes sure that a module that has been "forced" to be loaded won't
> > have its markers used. It is important to leave this check to make sure the
> > kernel does not crash by expecting the markers part of the struct module by
> > mistake in the case there is an incorrect checksum.
>
> OK, I've applied this to my tree. That means it will be in 2.6.26 unless you
> want me to push it earlier.
>
> Thanks,
> Rusty.
I think it's ok to wait for 2.6.26, since we are already very far in the
2.6.25 release process and it's more a "feature" than a "bugfix".
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists