linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/17] ide-tape: remove pipelined mode tape control flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:09:44 +0100
From:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/17] ide-tape: remove pipelined mode tape control flags

On Monday 17 March 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...il.com>

applied

> @@ -1832,14 +1822,6 @@ static int idetape_init_read(ide_drive_t *drive, int max_stages)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!test_bit(IDETAPE_FLAG_PIPELINE_ACTIVE, &tape->flags)) {
> -		if (tape->nr_pending_stages >= 3 * max_stages / 4) {
> -			tape->measure_insert_time = 1;
> -			tape->insert_time = jiffies;
> -			tape->insert_size = 0;
> -			tape->insert_speed = 0;
> -		}
> -	}

It is !test_bit() so the second 'if ()' block should be preserved
(I fixed this while merging the patch).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/