[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440803211208v40088eb1qe3f03977b220078@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:08:29 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"kernel list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: early memtest to find bad ram
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 6:08 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > very nice patch! I always thought that this was the proper way to do
> > memtest - and we could in fact also do something like this after SMP
> > bringup, and hit the memory bus via multiple CPUs. [that will need a
> > different enumeration though than e820 maps]
> >
> > one structural observation: please make this unified functionality, so
> > that 32-bit kernels can make use of it too.
> >
>
> Indeed. Of course, it would also be nice if distros shipped
> bootloader-invoked prekernel test software, like memtest86+, by default.
the current memtest86 is running in 32 bit mode, and only support 64G ram.
I tried to expand that a bit, to support 1024g, but it only works on
some machine.
could be stack provide is not big enough?
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists