[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47E4137C.3010203@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:58:52 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: early memtest to find bad ram
Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 6:08 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> >
>> > very nice patch! I always thought that this was the proper way to do
>> > memtest - and we could in fact also do something like this after SMP
>> > bringup, and hit the memory bus via multiple CPUs. [that will need a
>> > different enumeration though than e820 maps]
>> >
>> > one structural observation: please make this unified functionality, so
>> > that 32-bit kernels can make use of it too.
>> >
>>
>> Indeed. Of course, it would also be nice if distros shipped
>> bootloader-invoked prekernel test software, like memtest86+, by default.
>
> the current memtest86 is running in 32 bit mode, and only support 64G ram.
>
> I tried to expand that a bit, to support 1024g, but it only works on
> some machine.
> could be stack provide is not big enough?
>
Wonder how hard it would be to make it run 64 bits...
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists