lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0803222256410.3781@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:	Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:58:59 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
	Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>
Subject: Re: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported
 regressions from 2.6.24)

On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > 
> > Can an MMIO region reside above 0x1'0000'0000 on x86-32? ... Apparently yes,
> > if CONFIG_RESOURCES_64BIT=y.
> 
> Hmm. It would only work if PAE (HIGHMEM64G) is enabled too.
> 
> And obviously the hardware has to have working 64-bit BAR's.
> 
> AND no, I don't think our x86-32 ioremap() actually works for this case, 
> because while the resource data may have the full 64 bits, when the 
> ioremap() happens it gets truncated to 32 bits.
> 
> Ingo/Thomas - should ioremap*() perhaps take "resource_size_t" or a "u64" 
> for the address (and then "__ioremap()" should probably take a PFN, not a 
> physical address, and that one can remain just a "unsigned long"?)

Hmm. No idea. I look into that on monday (tomorrow is family
day). Right now I'm too tired to provide any useful input.
 
> Has anybody ever had a working 64-bit BAR on x86? Ivan? Maybe I'm missing 
> something..

Same here.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ