[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a8748490803211710u4c5d1d67x2a5a891347e0adf6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 01:10:40 +0100
From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
To: "Chris Wright" <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
"Justin Forbes" <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
"Zwane Mwaikambo" <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
"Dave Jones" <davej@...hat.com>,
"Chuck Wolber" <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
"Chris Wedgwood" <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
"Michael Krufky" <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
"Chuck Ebbert" <cebbert@...hat.com>,
"Domenico Andreoli" <cavokz@...il.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 07/76] NIU: Bump driver version and release date.
On 21/03/2008, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org> wrote:
> -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> ---------------------
>
I don't see how this one fits this criteria from
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt :
...
- It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a
problem..." type thing).
...
As I see it, this patch is quite trivial and does not fix any "real problem".
How come this is suitable for -stable?
I have no objections to the patch "as such", I just don't think it
makes sense for -stable.
> From: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
> Upstream commit: a442585952f137bd4cdb1f2f3166e4157d383b82
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
>
> ---
> drivers/net/niu.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/net/niu.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/niu.c
> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@
>
> #define DRV_MODULE_NAME "niu"
> #define PFX DRV_MODULE_NAME ": "
> -#define DRV_MODULE_VERSION "0.6"
> -#define DRV_MODULE_RELDATE "January 5, 2008"
> +#define DRV_MODULE_VERSION "0.7"
> +#define DRV_MODULE_RELDATE "February 18, 2008"
>
> static char version[] __devinitdata =
> DRV_MODULE_NAME ".c:v" DRV_MODULE_VERSION " (" DRV_MODULE_RELDATE ")\n";
>
--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists