| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:14:01 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: jesper.juhl@...il.com Cc: chrisw@...s-sol.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org, jmforbes@...uxtx.org, zwane@....linux.org.uk, tytso@....edu, rdunlap@...otime.net, davej@...hat.com, chuckw@...ntumlinux.com, reviews@...cw.f00f.org, mkrufky@...uxtv.org, cebbert@...hat.com, cavokz@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, gregkh@...e.de Subject: Re: [patch 07/76] NIU: Bump driver version and release date. From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com> Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 01:10:40 +0100 > As I see it, this patch is quite trivial and does not fix any "real problem". > How come this is suitable for -stable? > > I have no objections to the patch "as such", I just don't think it > makes sense for -stable. It makes a difference for driver maintainers when users report bugs and we ask them for the version printed by the driver so that we know which fixes have been applied. You know, if people are going to be jerky about this, I'll just include the version bump in the actual bug fixes which I sometimes do anyways. Thanks for bringing this up, it's a useful use of everyone's time :-/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists